Articles & Publications
Continuing its recent trend to mirror their federal counterpart, the Minnesota Supreme Court (the “Court”) recently approved several amendments to the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure (“MRCP”).
On May 21, 2018, the Minnesota Court of Appeals, in an unpublished decision, affirmed the rulings of the district court judge overseeing all asbestos litigation in Minnesota on various grounds.
Despite a bipartisan push to significantly alter workplace sexual harassment law in Minnesota, the legislative session ended this week with no changes to the law. At issue was the proposed rejection of the “severe or pervasive” standard that has prevailed for sexual harassment1 claims nationally and in Minnesota for more than 30 years. Proponents of the bill contended that the legal standard is too onerous to prove an allegation of sexual harassment. Business groups, meanwhile, maintained that the proposal would have created a level of uncertainty for Minnesota employers. What remains to be seen is whether, inspired by the #MeToo movement, the Minnesota Legislature revisits this issue during its next session.
The Supreme Court of the United States granted a petition for certiorari this week in an asbestos case which may directly impact the ability of equipment manufacturers to assert the “bare metal” defense. Where applicable, the bare metal defense generally exempts manufacturers from liability for injuries caused by parts or components they did not manufacture, distribute, or sell.
Governor Scott Walker signed Wisconsin’s most recent tort reform bill into law earlier this month. Assembly Bill 773 (“AB 773”) aims to lower litigation costs for businesses by modernizing and tightening Wisconsin’s outdated rules of civil procedure.